Should Buddhists Dye Their Hair?
Or have their hair professionally cut and styled? And what about wearing make-up? Or getting plastic surgery? Is this an ego thing? And if we do these things how far should we take it? How do these things fit within a Buddhist life?
One of my most frequented blogs is called dhamma musings. The humor, creativity and thorough knowledge demonstrated in this blog is delightful. Shravasti Dhammika who has been a monk for over 30 years and is now based in Singapore has written two wonderful articles there about Buddhism and Hair. Hair and More on Hair.
Seems Buddha himself wasn’t too concerned with hair although those around him certainly were. And in a comment to the first Hair article mentioned, Barry wrote that in Zen tradition hair is known as “ignorance grass” .
Having done this bit of research on Buddhist views of hair and finding no definitive answer it is obvious I have to go deeper into history, to the very roots of Buddhism and that is to Hinduism. And there’s certainly lots of material there. Here’s the background stuff. Try to keep reading, I’m going to talk about the Kama Sutra pretty soon!
Hinduism accepts the following objectives of human life, known as the puruṣārthas:
- kāma “sensual pleasure”
- artha “livelihood, wealth”
- dharma “righteousness” [or "duty" in some definitions]
- mokṣa “liberation, freedom [from samsara]“
There are four stages of life in Hinduism and these are known as the four Ashramas and the Hindu concept of dharma (duty) infuses each stage:
- Brahmacharya: The first 20 years of life, often referred to as the scholar stage. Brahmacharya was, for the Brahmin and other upper castes a time for learning and contemplation of life with the help of a Guru.
- Grihastha : next 40 years (20-60) is the householder’s stage. Once married one satisfies the above-mentioned kama(sense pleasure) and artha(material gain) within married life and career.
- Vanaprastha: Next 20 years (60-80) is the detachment from the material world, entering into contemplation and for undertaking pilgrimages (such as the Char Dham Yatra which I mentioned in a previous post).
- Sanyasa: conception of the mystic life to prepare the next life or moksha.
So the initial times in life are when one is actively engaged with the world and has interaction with it. There is not any sense of guilt about making a living or enjoying some of the things in life. It is, in fact, something of a responsibility. This is perhaps where the 8 fold path is helpful in a Buddhist sense. Things such as Right Livelihood and Right View can help steer one’s choices while engaged in the householder’s stage.
The text of the Kama Sutra, and it is a text not an illustrated sex manual, has a number of references to beautification of the body in order to enhance the bond between people in a relationship. There is even a recipe for a henna preparation to dye the hair.
A Slight Digression
The Kama Sutra itself gives an interesting look at some of the thinking in India in pre-colonial times. The intricacy of social and sexual relationships is quite astounding. The entire book is a manual of how to conduct one’s self within these types of relationships. Sexual monogamy is not seen as the ideal in this text. And marriage and “pleasure” relationships are often co-existing. Their importance and duration however are very distinct. Marriage is for life and pleasure is a quickly passing fancy.
India has a long history of polygamy (man with numerous wives) and polyandry (woman with numerous husbands). Sexual possessiveness, in the sense of exclusivity, while certainly an issue with some jealousies no doubt arising, was not a principal concern. There are people in my area that still maintain these practices. Particularly polyandry wherein a woman is married to 2 or more husbands, usually brothers. In socio-economic terms this has worked where rapid increase in population is not sustainable and where the incomes of 2 men are often needed to support a family. And there is support for this in such ancient Hindu epics as the Mahabharata wherein Draupadi, the principal female protagonist, is married to the 5 Pandava brothers. Although later one of them, Bhim, marries another. (a Rakshasa who is sort of a powerful spirit-a great story but I digress further) The Mahabharata itself contains the Bhagavad Gita one of the most referenced texts on Hinduism and the god Krishna.
Conclusions
Since I’m writing a blog post here and not a thesis I won’t go on much further with that. The concluding points for me from looking at this topic for a while seem to relate to two areas. They are attachment and vanity.
If hair becomes an obsession and takes away time, money, attention and focus from other more significant aspects of life then it is quite obvious that there is some skewing regarding perspective. One is not wholly defined by a bad hair day. Nor is one defined by ornately decorated extensions and thousands of dollars worth of “product”. The ego investment seems to equal the dollar investment.
Superficial enhancements are just that. They define one in a superficial way and in a superficial environment. Seen as such I don’t see any issue with it. It becomes play, a dress-up game. But seen as a definition of self on a deeper level is counter-productive and quite likely damaging to the self.
If one is trying to trick nature by holding onto some past stage in life and live in or relive the past or create some projected “beautiful” future, it is a psychologically and emotionally convoluted situation. This does not accord with life in reality at present. It is trying to live a dream or fantasy. And fantasy is never as rich and deep and rewarding as reality.
And yes I am going to dye the hair. Why? Partly to maintain a certain social image. And more importantly because someone close to me says to see any grey hairs reminds him I’m going to die some time and that makes him feel sad. Sometimes it’s as simple as that.

I like this post so much. My dear wife is a hairdresser so there’s more “hair consciousness” around our house than most houses. She cuts my hair – short, but not as short as when I cut it myself with clippers. I let her dye it for a short while, but it felt wrong for me so now the old pelt is slowly turning gray.
Will say that the first time I cut my hair really short – 1/8 inch – I felt incredibly liberated. And I continue to appreciate the liberation of “no muss, no fuss” hair. And I also appreciate the beauty of hair that reflects a conscious decision to care for it.
What color are you going to dye your hair? Purple?!
It was purple for quite some time years back. And in a Mohawk style. This time Medium Brown will do.
Try bald, NellaLou, opens a completely new set of doors!
3 times in life I have shaved my head. Didn’t last long though. It seemed more work than all the hair dye. Although ultimately that will quite likely be the style I affect for my senior years.
Seems to me that, if we’re talking about householders, at least, styling one’s hair a certain way, wearing a certain type of clothes, and those sorts of things fulfill more than just egoistic functions. I have an office job and, right or wrong, my employer expects me to present myself in certain ways that announce to the world I am a “professional.” It’s an interesting trade-off. I make more money than I would at many manual labor jobs, but I’m expected to wear more expensive clothes. Meanwhile, I would be just as happy (happier) in jeans and a sweatshirt. It’s not really about what I want, it’s about social convention. And while this may seem like mindless conformity, it’s not really. I know I’m playing a game, but it’s a game I choose to engage in so I can earn my paycheck. If I didn’t like it, I could go work in a gas station, or shave my head and live in a monastery (believe me, I’ve thought about it). As long as the tradeoffs we make aren’t immoral ones, it’s all part of Right Livelihood, I suppose.
Sorry to be so long-winded. Just thinking while typing.
jmcleod76 Thanks for your comment. It has sparked some reflection on what I refer to as our collective fictions which is how people live together by participating in an agreed upon set of rules standards, beliefs and other organizing factors which are actually changeable and evolving and differ from culture to culture. I think there’s a blog post in that. Thanks again.
u told that buddhism root lies in hinduism this is completely wrong .. in hinduism their are over 1 crore god (beside 3 main) and 6 months of festivals inbudhism we have just 2 that 2 budha told not to celebrate
in budhism hold that ther r no god but evry one is having a illusion as effect from his/her own personal karma (and this is not from hinduism as there u can skip all the bad effect of your karma just by taking a ‘holy’ dip in now polluted ganga river
in budhhism even god are not permanent and r subject to ther karma (remember these r not god whom u can worship to get ur sin ridded but these entity have illusion of being a god
in buddhism every one can become god and that the ultimate thing for evry one …good luck u !
hello anupam singh gautam-I do agree with your points about Hindu doctrine and Buddhist doctrine particularly with regard to theology. However saying that Buddhism has its roots in Hinduism is quite correct. The historical Buddha was born into a Hindu family and quite aware of the practices of that religion. Even after home leaving he studied with quite a number of Hindu teachers. However, and this is the important point he came to reject much of the Hindu doctrine in favor of the truth he discovered during his time alone seeking the truth.
He investigated the concepts that were presented to him from Hinduism thoroughly and rejected most and refashioned others.
The context and foundation that provided him with the means to discover the truth were all based in Hinduism. So historically that is what is meant by the roots of Buddhism.I have said numerous times in this blog that Buddha is not a god but a historical teacher.
Of course since his discovery Buddhism has become its own system and carried on in a manner quite different than the Hindu doctrine. The karmic doctrine, ritual requirements such as festivals and the very sense of what makes a “god” or human being are very different in Hinduism and Buddhism. I did not anywhere state that they are the same. Or that any doctrines are the same. I am quite aware of the differences.
some buddhist….you are going to change your hair for socila image ?????????? goes against everything, no question about it
Take a look at the well practiced buddhist’s hair cuts and you will notice that they are all the same and that their hair doesnt effect their ’social status’
*reflect* their social status^
not effect
Hello Chris. This well-practiced Buddhist does sometimes affect a stylish haircut and color. There are no rules about that for lay people in the Tripitaka. If you find such please let me know. Thanks.